Do some jurisdictions still trust digital evidence? Adobe Photoshop from 1992 allowed photo manipulation. In 2002 video manipulation was so common that hentai such as Stratosphere no Yousei show how

Attribution: cover photo is Apple’s new “Final Cut Pro” digital manipulation software

This post allows all uses (just remember to give attribution to Apple if you use photos of their software).

Intro

Image manipulation through Adobe Photoshop became common in the year 1992.

Episode 5 of Nymphs of the Stratosphere shows all how to produce misrepresentative video footage. The show was released in Japan as far back as 2002.

The biggest defense against such doctored images is analysis for realistic (versus anomalous) luminescence, but since the early 2000s ray-tracing algorithms have solved the "rendering equation" (the calculus formulas which allow to produce photo-realistic images) on platforms available to consumers. Assistant lists numerous software programs which now do so, available to consumers.

Is not required to have "better than most" experience with Photoshop (or equivalent video editors); generative transformers can do all this for you.

The synthesis is as simple as; setup TensorFlow to import annotated media of reference individuals (with the most common poses) as inputs, and repulsive (criminal, such as cold blooded murder, or bestial, such as sex with pigs or goats, or necrophilic, such as sex with your ancestors' exhumed remnants) poses as outputs (TensorFlow will produce mathematical tensors which transform those inputs into those outputs), and then give the algorithm new input images (or videos) of you (or your mom or dad), such that the algorithm outputs synthetic images (or videos) of you (or your mom or dad) involved in cold-blooded murder, or having sex with pigs or goats (or sex with the remnants of your ancestors' exhumed corpses). Anyone can do this without much practice.

TensorFlow has a Python version and a C++ version; if all you want to do is forge visuals (or sounds), the Python version requires the lowest amount of skill and practice and is what most pornographers and forgers use (there are now numerous platforms which allow you to design photo-realistic “companions” through generative transformers, with sexual animations which you purchase with your credit card; most of those use the Python version of TensorFlow). The C++ version is lower level (requires more specific knowledge to use, but allows lower API access, which suit to assistants for school use, and to computer vision for autonomous tools.)

This is an example of doctored evidence produced through a generative transformer (“AI”), plus generative-transformer-produced post of how to produce such doctored images, plus how the human visual cortices are so easy for modern software to fool.

In 2012 juror awareness of how simple it is to produce misrepresenative footage started to improve, so persecutorial tactics switched to having the accused tortured and / or raped to the brink of death (behind closed doors, so the accused does not mention it in court) and then promised to be released in exchange for a confession, or almost killing the accused through restrictive “diets” which are close to starvation and then promising that confession will give a move from such deadly jails into prisons which offer more food. This “plea bargain” system is reminescent of the medieval “Star Chamber” torture.

Coupled with how common it is for witnesses to lie, be bribed, hallucinate, misidentify, or misremember, and with how many actual criminal acts are the result of lack of adequate schools and jobs, or are due to mental illness, the whole criminal justice system should just be thrown out (shut down).

Goal

Since the “discovery” of the laws of motion, all technology has ever been used for is the human slave trade (which the"justice system" is a euphemism for). Because of “technology”, the “modeern” world is much worse than that of prehistoric farmers (perhaps worse than wild animals). The sole purpose of this post is to ensure that technology is not used for the human slave trade from now.

Related posts

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43639704 (BBC News article about how such tools were used to produce realistic footage of former president Barack Obama saying things which were never said). Such synthesized footage is all over YouTube, and the tools which produced such are available for all to download and use.

What is impressive about those tools is how few samples of target's voices are required for realistic synthesis, and how smooth the synthesized lip motions (which match the synthetic dialog) produced are. Since public (low cost or no cost) tools can produce realistic forgeries, who can deny that digital footage is now simple to spoof?

---

Other forms of what was want “evidence” are now simple to forge; Fox News discusses how to lift fingerprints from public places and printout clones, or molds, which give identical traces as the originals.

Numerous tutorials exist (such as this tutorial from Inverse) about how to produce masks which fool visual biometrics with affordable tools.

Now that the layperson can spoof anyone at low cost, it is important that all such “evidence” is barred from court. Since such forges were affordable for so long, most convictions since 2002 should be reversed / thrown out.